Avandia Heart Risks News
Diabetes Drug Avandia Should Stay On Market, Most Of FDA Panel Says
- WSJ
07/14/2010 - Federal advisers delivered a mixed verdict Wednesday on the diabetes drug Avandia, with a significant number of experts voting to recommend that it be pulled from the market because of safety concerns but a majority urging to keep it available, perhaps with tough new restrictions and new warnings.
In the most closely watched of a series of votes, 12 of the 33 members of the Food and Drug Administration panel voted to withdraw Avandia.
But 10 voted that it should remain available with serious revisions to its label and possible restrictions on its sale. Seven voted to add further warnings to the drug's label. Three voted to continue to allow sales without making any change in its status. One member abstained.
The votes came after the panel concluded that there was sufficient evidence to be concerned that Avandia increases the risk for heart attacks and strokes but insufficient evidence that the drug increases the risk for death.
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg will make the final decision about Avandia's future. Hamburg has pledged to make drug safety a priority, and many observers are watching what the agency does about Avandia as a potentially key moment for the FDA under the new administration.
Agency scientists are divided about the drug's safety.
"Any action taken by the FDA after this vote, and after the agency's record with this drug, will be closely watched by physicians and patients who need to feel confident that the FDA has put science and safety first," said Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who has been investigating Avandia.
The mixed vote illustrated the intensity of the debate over the drug. Critics, who were disappointed by the panel's vote, argued the drug was clearly dangerous and unnecessary. Others, however, expressed concern about pulling a drug that may be useful to some diabetics, who frequently need to try more than one medication.
The committee, which reviewed more than 1,000 pages of information and heard from 18 speakers who presented more than 500 slides of data, also voted to recommend that the FDA allow a large new international study that GlaxoSmithKline is conducting to help settle the issue by directly comparing Avandia to Actos, another diabetes drug. The study is controversial because of concerns it would unethical to give some patients a drug with known safety concerns.
Many panel members expressed frustration over the lack of clear evidence about the drug's safety or risks, especially given how long it has been used.
Approved in 1999, Avandia quickly became the world's most popular drug to treat Type 2 diabetes, which is the most common form of the disease and is increasing because of the obesity epidemic. But in 2007, Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Steven E. Nissen published a study concluding that the drug
significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular problems, the leading cause of death among diabetics.
Sales of Avandia plummeted, and the FDA issued strong new warnings about the drug's safety. But after a panel of advisers voted later that year to keep the drug on the market despite concerns about its safety, the FDA decided not to pull it and hundreds of thousands of diabetics still use the drug.
Critics have argued the decision to keep Avandia on the market illustrates the agency's failure to protect the public from dangerous drugs, especially in the wake of high-profile drug safety concerns about the painkiller Vioxx and other medications.
Since then, more evidence has accumulated about the drug's risks, as well as allegations that GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Avandia, knew about the dangers but hid them from regulators and the public. The company has denied the charges and defended the drug's safety.
"We will, of course, continue to work with the FDA in the best interest of diabetes patients who face this chronic and serious disease," GlaxoSmithKline's Ellen Strahlman said in a statement. "Patients taking Avandia should speak with their physician about their treatment and any questions they may have regarding the safety of the medicine."
During the hearing, some diabetes experts, physicians and patients urged the FDA to keep the drug on the market, citing its effectiveness at lowering blood sugar levels and preventing many complications of the disease, including blindness.
"In making this plea to keep Avandia on the market, I believe I am pleading for my life," said Chuck Keyserling, who has been taking Avandia for 10 years. Keyserling said alternative drugs, such as Actos, have not worked for him and other patients. "For those patients, a negative decision about Avandia may be a death sentence."
Avandia Side Effects Cases Still Being Accepted:
The lawyers of Ennis & Ennis, P.A. are still accepting Avandia side effects cases and have extensive experience representing plaintiffs in Avandia lawsuits nationwide.
If you or a loved one have experienced an Avandia heart attack, or Avandia stroke, Avandia congestive heart failure, Avandia cardiovascular disease or if you have lost a loved one to an Avandia death you may be entitled to compensation. Contact the Avandia lawyers of Ennis & Ennis, P.A. today about an Avandia lawsuit. Call us toll free for a free, confidential case evaluation or fill out our online Avandia case evaluation form
|